Talk:The Crane's View Trilogy
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Klbrain in topic Proposed merge with Kissing the Beehive
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The contents of the The Marriage of Sticks page were merged into The Crane's View Trilogy on 21 July 2018. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| The contents of the Kissing the Beehive page were merged into The Crane's View Trilogy on 14 August 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Proposed merge with The Marriage of Sticks
editUnremarkable book. Only significance is part of The Crane's Trilogy. Cbs527 (talk) 15:23, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 14:34, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Proposed merge with The Wooden Sea
editUnremarkable book. Only significance is part of The Crane's Trilogy. Cbs527 (talk) 15:26, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Proposed merge with Kissing the Beehive
editUnremarkable book. Only significance is part of The Crane's Trilogy. Cbs527 (talk) 15:28, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose No particular benefit in merging these. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:17, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support merge of all 3 to the series, given that each alone doesn't reach the criteria for Wikipedia:Notability (books). For example, reaching the final of a notable book award isn't sufficient, but winning would be. All 3 are stubs and the information on each page would benefit from being discussed in the context of the wider series. Klbrain (talk) 03:43, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Reopened the merge proposal for Kissing the Beehive as the same arguments for the last 2 books appear to apply for the 1st book in the series; lack of independent notability. Klbrain (talk) 14:37, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support merge of all 3 to the series, given that each alone doesn't reach the criteria for Wikipedia:Notability (books). For example, reaching the final of a notable book award isn't sufficient, but winning would be. All 3 are stubs and the information on each page would benefit from being discussed in the context of the wider series. Klbrain (talk) 03:43, 9 June 2018 (UTC)