Talk:The DailyER

Untitled

I believe that the Dailyer Nebraskan deserves due to the fact that it is the largest humor magazine published in the state of Nebraska, and is read by at least 10,000 people in print and over 5,000 unique hits per month on its website. It is talked about very often within the Nebraska newspaper community and I believe a Wikipedia page would help to inform people of what exactly the Dailyer Nebraskan is all about.

This information is given in the page. --Gregory32389 (talk) 03:23, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

This page already has more notability and sources then the Daily Nebraskan page. I do not understand how you can say this lacks notability. I would almost say that wikipedia is biased against satirical papers, but I just don't think the admins understand how big this paper is. --Gregory32389 (talk) 04:10, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Dailyer Nebraskan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dailyernebraskan.com/article/editors-note-342008
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dailyernebraskan.com/article/bo-pelini-guest-column-i-cant-wait-to-parlay-this-move-to-the-big-ten-into-a-job-at-ohio-state

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:24, 1 April 2016 (UTC)