Talk:The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump

27

Don't really see the need for inline sources, but just in case, as per sources (two of them used for this article)

• https://www.salon.com/2017/09/19/the-dangerous-case-of-donald-trump-robert-jay-lifton-and-bill-moyers-on-a-duty-to-warn_partner/
• https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2017/09/17/trump_vs_psychiatrists_whos_crazier_135019.html
• https://www.amazon.com/Dangerous-Case-Donald-Trump-Psychiatrists/dp/1250179459
• http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-psychiatrists-madness-catching-goldwater-rule-yale-dr-bandy-lee-a7971326.html
• http://www.oregonlive.com/trending/2017/09/is_donald_trump_actually_crazy.html

Regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 00:42, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Vox article

Vox says that their goal is clear, explanatory journalism, and this article does that very well:

https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/1/5/16770060/trump-mental-health-psychiatrist-25th-amendment
The psychiatrist who briefed Congress on Trump’s mental state: this is “an emergency”
The case for evaluating the president’s mental capacity — by force if necessary.
By Eliza Barclay
Vox
Jan 5, 2018

--Nbauman (talk) 04:58, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

@Nbauman: Added to support an existing sentence with a cited quote. Thanks, —PaleoNeonate – 19:23, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Attribution for use of material in Draft:Mental health of Donald Trump

Material from this page has been incorporated into Draft:Mental health of Donald Trump. bd2412 T 01:42, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Cannon comment

I removed it for a few reasons: it seems to be a random opinion by someone who misunderstood the foreword and who believes that Trump derangement syndrome is an actual thing. The foreword was a survey of important history events where psychologists have participated. Apart from that and calling all those events malignant, there was no claim of equivalency. —PaleoNeonate – 18:27, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Advertisement tag

I left it as I think that part of the lead and maybe the beginning of the reception section appear promotional. The lead section part cites a primary source about that it was a best-seller, that a new edition was in demand, etc. —PaleoNeonate – 18:31, 14 August 2020 (UTC)