This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
This article was copy edited by Leiovus, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 17 March 2020.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Throughout the article, the entity is referred to both as the Darkness and The Darkness. Is 'the' apart of its name? I say this because the article which it is linked to (Read: The Darkness) refers to it without the capitalised 'The'. Just double checking, this is a real easy fix either way. Thanks!
--Leiovus (talk) 14:42, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Edit: There seems to be an overwhelming usage of 'the Darkness' in the article, so I'm going to go with that and quickly patch this up. Feel free to correct me if needed, thanks again and sorry for seemingly answering my own question, but the point is absolutely still open to discussion if need be. Thanks again. --Leiovus (talk) 14:45, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
There's a single citation in the lead for "Demon Arms". This doesn't seem to be anything particularly likely to be challenged, it's verified later in the body by other sources, and the rest of the lead is absent of cites. I'd recommend removing it due to redundancy. See WP:LEAD for more details. AntiGravityMaster (talk) 03:18, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Opening paragraph calls the Demon Arms "demon tentacles", then "demon tendrils". Stay consistent with the nomenclature. If what the Demon Arms are isn't obvious, I'd suggest introducing them as "...Additionally, he is armed with a pair of Demon Arms, which resemble tentacles and can be used to slash enemies or pick up various items within the environment..." or something similar. AntiGravityMaster (talk) 03:18, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Done
These three sentences "When exposed to light, Jackie's health regeneration and Darkness abilities are disabled and the Darkling will vanish, leaving Jackie with firearms as his only defense. Jackie's vision will blur and he will experience a high-pitched ringing. The player must avoid directly exposing Jackie to light sources or disable them by shooting out lights or destroying power generators." should be rephrased/merged to be less fragmented. The second sentence is particularly jarring. AntiGravityMaster (talk) 03:18, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Some more links would be good, for things such as "samurai sword", "blunderbuss", and "...various firearms, such as submachine guns, shotguns, and assault rifles..."
Done - I put a quotation mark for the first instance of mention. I don't think we need a quotation mark every time we mention this mode, but I have remove the WP:ITALIC.
This section is completely citation-free. While there may be some redundancy with previously listed citations, it's a bit jarring to go from a section with frequent citations into a section with absolutely none. The lead is an exception to this and generally does not need citations if the information therein is sourced later in the article, but the plot section should have some. AntiGravityMaster (talk) 03:18, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
We rarely have sources for this section per WP:VG/PLOT
These issues aren't too major, but they're holding back the article from meeting the criteria. You can use the {{done}} tag to indicate when a concern has been met. Feel free to shoot me a message when you believe the article is ready for reconsideration. Good luck!
Done
b (citations to reliable sources): 
c (OR): 
