Talk:The Daytona Beach News-Journal

[Untitled]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was move. Andrewa 21:19, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Requested move

Daytona Beach News-Journal → The Daytona Beach News-Journal – Duplicate articles, old name has more information, yet new name reflects more accurate title Tobogganoggin 18:45, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Survey

Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

Discussion

Add any additional comments

(Usage at the website seems inconstent. The website itself appears to be named "News-Journal Online", while the masthead of physical printings does include the definite article "The" in its title (as do references to the company itself, as in address headings). Therefore, "The Daytona Beach News-Journal" appears to be the "official" title of the publication. See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (definite and indefinite articles at beginning of name), also Newseum) Tobogganoggin 19:20, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Controversies

Disclosure: I work for The Daytona Beach News-Journal. However, I have strived to remain impartial in my edits, changing the statement that the company declared bankruptcy to the fact that we attempted to but were rejected, and adding that our board of directors was fired by the court-appointed receiver. Also removed conjecture about the company's future, as it is opinion and is not cited. CABridges (talk) 18:24, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Daytona Beach News-Journal front page.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Daytona Beach News-Journal front page.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 1 March 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Daytona Beach News-Journal front page.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:24, 1 March 2012 (UTC)