Talk:The Division Bell/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer:

I will be reviewing this article. At first glance, you need to correct the infobox as per {{infobox album}} by moving the critical reviews to the #Reception section. Also, you need to wikilink your sources and not just list them as "allmusic.com" or "billboard.com". --Legolas ^(talk2me) 07:12, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

I just want to really quickly note that Ref #49 (http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/retrieve_chart_history.do?model.chartFormatGroupName=Albums&model.vnuArtistId=61137&model.vnuAlbumId=768708) is a deadlink that needs to be fixed. –MuZemike 22:17, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

• Noting that reviewer hasn't edited in a while, and since there isn't much of a start a new reviewer needs to take over and do a review. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 04:08, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review

This was not marked as "under review" at WP:GAN, so I'll take over. Pyrotec (talk) 11:53, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Pyrotec - I had wondered what was happening here... Parrot of Doom 13:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Not a lot it seems. But should be finished today - depends if I find "errors" that I need fixing. Pyrotec (talk) 13:48, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

I now know what Andy Mabbett does in the real world. Pyrotec (talk) 14:33, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Ta very muchly :) Parrot of Doom 15:42, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Overall summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

A comprehensive, well-referenced article.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Well referenced.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Well referenced.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Congratulations on the quality of the article. I'm awarding it GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 14:33, 6 April 2010 (UTC)