Talk:The Doors/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Discography - Singles

Sup everyone i fixed up the old crappy singles chart in discography and put it in a real chart ;) np anyway. contact me if any complaints becuase i dont want it edited unless you notify me...thx chris. needed. ChrisMHMChris.

Ed Sullivan Incident

I notice that the incident of Morrison saying the word "higher" on the Ed Sullivan Show is repeated twice. I don't believe this is neccessary, considering that it is repeated in a passage that starts in the year 1969, although the incident happened in 1967.

Accordionman August 9, 2006

1970 isle of wright

Hi all I hope that someone can help me I have a vinyl l.p with J.M's face on it doing an interview backstage at the 1970 Isle Of Wright festival and I cannot find any information on it can some please help cheers Linz(Tasmania) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaylinz1 (talk • contribs) 07:41, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Why?

I was wondering why the following sentence is included in the "New Releases" section? "We also have to consider the possible influence of Pamela Courson." It sticks out as unrelated in a variety of ways. Who is "we"? Why must "we" consider her influence on new releases? Also, around this area of the article there is quite a bit of redundancy of information that perhaps could be slimmed down through appropriate editing. Thoughts?THX1136 (talk) 14:34, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Hard to tell what it's supposed to mean. That whole section is basically a discography and could be deleted. Piriczki (talk) 16:44, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

I removed the Courson sentence since there was no further discussion.THX1136 (talk) 15:09, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Class review

Class Review - Checked a few citations and the links work fine, reviewed the article and all seems to be relevant to the subject. Kbrackne (talk) 03:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Reunion years showing in "Members" section, do we need all of them?

There are currently seven seperate reunion years included in the members section next to various band members (1978, 1993, 1997, 2000, 2011, 2013, 2016). I do not think all of these years being shown here are accurate/necessary. I could understand maybe a few of them (particularly 1978, 1993 and 2000) as those are examples of all three surviving members of the band getting together as "The Doors" to perform a full selection of songs live or record a whole new album. The other years listed are merely of the musicians working on a single song, often just as featured musicians on another artists song (Skrillex). The reunion in 2016 was just of Densmore and Krieger and they did not perform together as The Doors. If that counts as an actual Doors reunion then the entire time Manzarek and Krieger performed together with their band would count as one too. Even the reuinons in 1978, 1993 and 2000 were just for a few songs performed live or a single collaboration on an album so they were all temporary too and could be argued as being unnecessary or unsubstantial enough to warrant mention in that section. Now IF Densmore and Krieger were to get together and tour as "The Doors," especially if it were to be a long reunion rather than just a single tour, then that would warrant adding more dates. However, I strongly doubt they will ever get together and perform under that name--Sk8punk3d288 (talk) 02:53, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Reunions by the members without all members of the band count as reunions. (Look at the Led Zeppelin reunions for example)WikiEditCrunch (talk) 21:28, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject proposal: Psychedelic music

If interested, please offer support for a WikiProject focused on psychedelic music.--Ilovetopaint (talk) 01:48, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

I love psychedelic music. Or at least I managed to listen to it for many hours before my brain exploded. Good luck with project.

Jakescows (talk) 13:34, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Good Article nomination 12 Aug 2017 by WikiEditCrunch

WikiEditCrunch's only edits to this article are 1) to remove a maintenance template ({{Refimprove section}}) without adding any needed refs with the edit summary "Template removed:Plenty of sources;All check out;Outdated template"[1]; 2) to change the "Personnel" section heading to "Members"[2] (MOS:ALBUM states "A personnel section should be included under a primary heading "Personnel""). —Ojorojo (talk) 15:52, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

[edit conflict] The Good article nominations Instructions include: "Articles can be nominated by anyone, though it is highly preferable that they have contributed significantly and are familiar with the subject" (emphasis added). This is helpful information for a potential reviewer to see the extent and quality of a nominator's contributions. —Ojorojo (talk) 16:07, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

They prefer it.Alright.Well whats most important is the article. Cheers WikiEditCrunch (talk) 16:24, 16 August 2017 (UTC)