Talk:The Dress

Latest comment: 20 minutes ago by ModernDayTrilobite in topic Requested move 22 September 2024

Requested move 22 September 2024

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Participants argued that, per WP:DIFFCAPS, the recent RM consensus at The dress does not necessarily reflect titling concerns for the capitalized term "The Dress". When analyzing usage of the capitalized term, participants reached a consensus that the meme is not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for "The Dress" capitalized as such. (closed by non-admin page mover) ModernDayTrilobite (talkcontribs) 15:12, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply


The DressThe Dress (disambiguation) – Per a recent RM at Talk:The dress, the meme is the primary topic. However, this meme can also be known in sources as "The Dress"[1][2], so there is no DIFFCAPS here. Move dabpage and retarget The Dress to the primary topic. 162 etc. (talk) 20:44, 22 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  • Per WP:DPT, let's have a look at some stats. WikiNav for The Dress says there were 330 views of the list, and we could identify 51 outgoing clicks to the proposed primary topic, which is just ~15.5%. By far the most common source of traffic is The dress (249), so a lot of people seem to be clicking on the hatnote there to get to here, rather than vice versa. This indicates that there is no primary topic by usage. Is there an argument for primary topic for long-term significance? Seems doubtful for a meme that is just a decade old. (Oppose) --Joy (talk) 07:46, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose – "the dress" has essentially no competition for primary topic, while "The Dress" has several films of that name. Looks like WP:DIFFCAPS to me. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:53, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.