Talk:The Escapist (website)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=icon}
 | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
Untitled
editDelete this article quickly! It obviously does not meet the notability criteria, and is thus unsuited for a prestigious and pretentious site such as Wikipedia. -Dalziel 86 04:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Please don't delete this article! Could you please cite the "notability criteria" you are using to justify the deletion of this article? I'm not sure why The Escapist (magazine) is allowed, but not The Escapist (website). GlenGyldersleve 17:23, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Of course, if I'd read the above post closely, I would have seen that the tone was sarcastic 8) GlenGyldersleve 18:45, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Notability
editSince Sp4083 keeps removing the notability tag, let's talk notability. There are no references to third-party sources on this article and it's impossible to have a quick look at Google to establish notability since there are a ton of things also called 'The Escapist'. I have doubts about whether this article satisfies the notability criteria. Thoughts? EvilRedEye 16:32, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
'Kay, I'm satisfied, thanks Mr. Walton. EvilRedEye 14:02, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm glad to be of service. The External References section was a part of the page when it was first created by Sandy Atunes a while ago, but it was deleted recently by someone else, for reasons that were never clear. I just cleaned it up a little and reposted it. --WJWalton 05:09, 12 November 2007 (UTC)