Talk:The Fight (The Office)

Fair use rationale for Image:TheOffice(US)2-06.jpg

Image:TheOffice(US)2-06.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Fight (The Office)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 16:32, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Quality of article is good.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   See comment section below. Article now complies with MoS.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   This section is good.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   References are included where needed.

   C. No original research:

   No original research found.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Major aspects of the topic are covered.

   B. Focused:

   The article remains focused throughout.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   No bias found.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   Article is stable.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   All tags on the images within the article are tagged properly. Infobox picture has a fair use rationale.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Images are provided where possible and the captions are suitable.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   See comment section below.Pass!

Comments

• "At the end of the day, Michael promotes Dwight from Assistant to the Regional Manager to Assistant Regional Manager", I don't understand what you are trying to say. Can you please clarify?

• "Eventually, she vented her frustration by "practically knock[ing]", whats the need of the "ing" in hard brackets?

The article will be on hold for 7 days. If you have any questions feel free to post them here or on my talk page.--Dom497 (talk) 18:25, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. I tried to clear up the first issue. It's rather hard to explain in words, but basically Dwight is "Assistant to the Regional Manager", ie a personal assistant. He dreams of being "Assistant Regional Manager", which is the second in command at the branch. Although the titles are similar, they are vastly different, and there's a lot of jokes about Dwight saying he's Assistant Regional Manager, when he's really just "Assistant to the Regional Manager". As for the second one, I put it in brackets because the original quote was "practically knocked", which didn't fit in with the grammar of the reworded sentence. Hope that helps!--Gen. Quon (talk) 04:19, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Makes sense.--Dom497 (talk) 23:53, 17 June 2012 (UTC)