Talk:The Firefly (Fringe)/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Miyagawa in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk) 00:04, 5 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'll be reviewing this article shortly. I'll give it a read through now and add any points that arise below. Miyagawa (talk) 00:04, 5 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ratings: "and with 7 days after airing, reported a total of 6.7 million viewers with 2.8 rating" - somehow doesn't sound quite right, I'm thinking that "and within 7 days after airing, it reported a total..." might be better.

And that is quite literally the only issue I have with this nomination. Placing this one on hold until rectified, which I'm sure won't take too long. Good job! Miyagawa (talk) 00:18, 5 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Fixed!. Please let me know if the article needs anything else. Thanks! Ruby2010 talk 00:42, 5 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

All good, happy to grade this one as a GA! Miyagawa (talk) 09:45, 5 March 2011 (UTC)Reply