Talk:The Free Edinburgh Fringe Festival
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
much more info on * link removed *, need to get around to sorting this page some day --MilkMiruku 05:24, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
the info on the page referenced above is an innacrate and misleading article written by a competing organisation so that link has been removed; further information can be found on the official Free Festival website here: www.freeferstival.co.uk; May 18 2008
Cleanup tags
editI would have liked to add some tags to this article, specifically that it contains no references, and is somewhat promotional in tone; but I have a potential conflict of interest as I am connected with another Edinburgh Fringe Venue. I'm not out to upset other venues, but as a Wikipedia editor I care about the quality of our articles.
I am actually dubious whether this, or most other Fringe Venues (including the one I am associated with) are notable in Wikipedia's terms (see my post at Talk:List of Edinburgh Fringe venues), and therefore should have articles at all. I see somebody else has tagged C venues some while ago. --ColinFine (talk) 22:08, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
DO NOT DELETE
editThe importance of the Laughing Horse Free Festival and PBH Free Fringe cannot be understated at Edinburgh Fringe... and therefore on Wikipedia. C Venues is just another collection of venues with the same business model that puts artists into debt. However the Free Festival and Free Fringe are challenging this traditional model in order to give artists and the public an alternative. See Harry Deansway's article about how much the traditional model costs performers [1]
The importance of Free [2]
The Free Venues give artists an alternative that is not as costly. For a long time Free Venues were seen as second rate. Artists felt that they could not get reviewed unless they did a paid show. However this is becoming less and less the case and Imran Yusuf's Fosters award for Best Newcomer in a free venue is really ground breaking. [3]
There are also large differences between Laughing Horse Free Festival and PBH Free Festival which are growing to provide two distinct opportunities to performers. PBH is a purist who feels the Free Venues should be run as a collective with everyone putting in an equal amount of work for the good of the group. Laughing Horse's approach is more commercial and aims to find an alternative business model which is economically sustainable but is a much cheaper option for punters and performers. This difference means that Laughing Horse is able to provide more support in terms of PR and marketing for performers, something which is set to grow. Laughing Horse is not adverse to sponsorship and just missed out on a large deal for this years event [4] comment added by Bobslayer (talk) 12:29, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Free Edinburgh Fringe Festival. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720130855/http://forums.chortle.co.uk/viewtopic.php?p=313636&sid=7503e5aa8991d85722dbc4a9af38710b to http://forums.chortle.co.uk/viewtopic.php?p=313636&sid=7503e5aa8991d85722dbc4a9af38710b
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:33, 11 January 2018 (UTC)