Talk:The French Democracy/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Jezhotwells in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Starting review, checking quick fail criteria. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:51, 12 April 2009 (UTC) {{pass} No problems with quick fail. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:56, 12 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Checking against GA criteria

edit
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):  
    • Lead:  Pass
    • Synopsis:  Pass I replaced with with using, better grammar.
    • Background and production:  Pass, I made some minor grammatical corrections.
    • Reception and impact:  Pass Jezhotwells (talk) 16:14, 12 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
    b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    • All references check out
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    • All appear to be to WP:RS
    c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its scope.
    a (major aspects):  
    • The article is broad in its scope
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    • Images are tagged and licensed or when non-free use, correctly argued fair use rationale.
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: