Talk:The Game Designers Studio

Merge Proposal

Since the article is a Start, and may always be a Start, unless there is a lot more material that will soon appear on the topic, I believe this article should be merged into its’ parent article, so we have one strong Good article and not a weaker Good article and a permanent Start article. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 19:20, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

• Support. It's just a barely notable shell company de facto wholly owned by Square. Axem Titanium (talk) 20:34, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
• Support My understanding is that we do not typically create articles for shell/paper corporations that only existed for legal purposes. This was just a legal fiction invented by Square; that it was not dissolved immediately upon Square's conversion into Square Enix doesn't change that. Amazon.com is actually a cluster of about a dozen corporate entities on paper that in reality is a single company, but we don't have articles on each one; neither should we have an article on a pretend company Square set up to get around an exclusivity deal, even if the "company" was not fully dissolved for years after it stopped existing. --PresN 21:44, 8 May 2020 (UTC)