Talk:The Ghost Network/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk) 12:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

I will review this article later today. Miyagawa (talk) 12:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Review:

• Writing: Can you insert a reference directly after the sentence containing "urban myths or legends of strange events" - I presume its the audio commentary; it'll cover "no man could possibly have known about" too.

Other than that, I can't find any problems. I've made a couple of copyedits. Images all check out, although there is a typo in the free use rationale for the image in the infobox. Good job! Miyagawa (talk) 21:33, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

I made the ref fix per your suggestion. Let me know if the article needs anything else. Thanks for the review! Ruby2010 comment! 16:47, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Article all checks out against the GA criteria, happy to promote! Miyagawa (talk) 23:13, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

You have my thanks, as always :) Ruby2010 comment! 23:35, 1 May 2011 (UTC)