Talk:The Girl Strike Leader/GA1

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Jaguar in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 19:07, 27 May 2015 (UTC)Reply


I'll finish this soon JAGUAR  19:07, 27 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

I'm trying out a new form of review in order to get through these faster (without sacrificing quality of course) JAGUAR  19:28, 27 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found.

Checking against GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    I would strongly recommend cutting the lead into two paragraphs, but it was minor so I did it myself
    "Release on July 8th, 1910" - released
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

I'll promote this, it's in as good shape as the others. Well done JAGUAR  19:32, 27 May 2015 (UTC)Reply