Talk:The Grand Canyon of the Yellowstone (1872)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Theleekycauldron in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk23:12, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
The Grand Canyon of the Yellowstone (1872)

Created by Bruxton (talk) and Mistico Dois (talk). Nominated by Bruxton (talk) at 04:40, 31 August 2022 (UTC).Reply

  •   Hi Bruxton, review follows: article moved to mainspace 31 August and exceeds minimum length; article is cited inline throughout to reliable sources; I didn't find any overly close paraphrasing from the article (phrases such as "served as inspiration for the initial conservation of Yellowstone", "world’s first national park" are probably unavoidable); hook is interesting, mentioned in the article and checks out to source cited; image is free and appropriately licensed; a QPQ has been carried out. A handful of other comments - Dumelow (talk) 09:55, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • "Moran did a first painting" feels a bit colloquial
  • "It is a 7 ft (2.1 m) by 12 ft (3.7 m) “The Grand Canyon of the Yellowstone,” and it was purchased by the United States Congress for $10,000" the title appearing here is strange and needs some wording around the size: "is a 7ftx12ft painting" or something.
  • The first sentence of "Reception" repeats the purchase and price
  • Likewise you have "The expedition influenced the public and government officials" in "History and description" then cover this again in "Reception"
  • "The public was not aware of the beauty of Yellowstone prior to Moran's painting" is a bold claim that I couldn't immediately find in the source
Dumelow Thank you for reviewing. I wrote this article too quickly. I have made the corrections. Bruxton (talk) 14:01, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Bruxton, will take a look. Just noticed you seem to have lost a reference at the end of the first paragraph of "History and description" - Dumelow (talk) 14:10, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Dumelow Found it! <:ref name="Reinhardt"/> Bruxton (talk) 15:27, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
  Thanks Bruxton, looks OK to me now - Dumelow (talk) 16:01, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply