Talk:The Great Money Caper/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Queenieacoustic in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 talk 04:17, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

I will review the article sometime later today or tomorrow. Ruby2010 talk 04:17, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Comments

edit
  • Note that I have not seen this particular episode. Please take a look at my comments above, and respond back on this page when you have made their corresponding edits. I will place the article on hold for seven days. Thanks, Ruby2010 talk 19:04, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Your changes look fine. Pass for GA. Nice work, Ruby2010 talk 23:07, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! :D Queenieacoustic (talk) 23:33, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply