Talk:The Greatest Hit (song)

Latest comment: 12 years ago by JHunterJ in topic Requested move (2008)

Requested move (2008)

edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

"The Greatest Hit" was the original title of the song. It wasn't referred to as "Greatest Hit" until it was included on Anniemal. PiracyFundsTerrorism (talk) 14:59, 6 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved as unambiguous. WP:COMMONNAME, WP:PRECISION, and WP:PRIMARYTOPIC indicate leaving at the base name. JHunterJ (talk) 01:21, 13 January 2012 (UTC)Reply


Requested move (2012)

edit

The Greatest HitThe Greatest Hit (Annie song) — "The Greatest Hit" is a highly generic title and should redirect to the disambiguation page Greatest Hits (disambiguation), since it is commonly used in hyperbole, and thus does not generally refer to this song. 76.65.128.132 (talk) 09:44, 2 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Survey

edit
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
  • Support. It is obvious that the singer intends the title to be taken as descriptive or generic, to attract more interest and even perhaps notoriety. Wikipedia should not be a party to that, or be duped by that. It should not participate by duping its readers. The present title is deceptive to almost all readers. Move to the slightly longer and far more informative version. [Details fixed later; I had things the wrong way round.–Noetica]NoeticaTea? 06:41, 6 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Discussion

edit
Any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.