 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
um. accidentally deleted everything, but my intended edit. i apologize, and will not try and edit again. once again, im sincerely sorry.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.225.71.163 (talk • contribs).
- It's not a big deal; the edit history shows that the damage was fairly limited and that the version stood for a grand total of four minutes before being fixed. Wikipedia has remarkable self-healing capabilities - don't worry about it, and don't take it as a reason to keep from editing if you would. These things happen. --Kizor 17:35, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
out of order.
editthis entire article seems to be out of order. It would help make things much more clear if someone put it in order. thanks. dposse 12:07, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- It's actually not bad, for a first go - but, you're right, everything is arranged by plot thread. If I get time later today, I'll attempt to sort it out, though I suspect someone else will get there first. ZZ 12:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- is it just me, or should there be slightly more succint plot summaries? They seem to go on for ages, especially for the last few episodes. It might not actually be possible to trim them down though as a lot of the information is fairly important. Maybe have a plot overview above the bigger (almost) scene-by-scene breakbown? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chibimech 03:58, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- You are completely right, and that's an issue for a vast amount of plot summaries over here. They often start out as "then he said and then she said and then he did and then she said", and it takes quite a bit of work and some amount of thought to make compact, succint and far more readable and informative versions (not to mention that I've seen at least one compact summary degenerated into a blow-by-blow retelling). The ones for the newest episodes haven't had time to mature. Anything you could do to help would be cool. --Kizor 13:38, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- In time, we should be able to distill the most important moments from each summary. I attempted to break everything into scenes, and I think I did alright for a first go. I cannot, however, confirm that the scenes are in the proper order - just that they're close. Fixing it should consist mostly of shifting paragraphs around. Once we see how the season concludes, we should be able to whittle this section to a more compact, streamlined summary. There are probably editors who can do it now - but I didn't want to miss something important (while keeping as much of the original as possible). ZZ 15:10, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- I don't have a problem with the out-of-order plot, if anything, its helpful to have it laid out this way, as reading won't become confusing. Its just the sheer size of the article seems a bit daunting. The problem is that almost everything in this episode was essential. I might have a go at shortening it if I have some spare time... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chibimech (talk • contribs) 10:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC).
- In time, we should be able to distill the most important moments from each summary. I attempted to break everything into scenes, and I think I did alright for a first go. I cannot, however, confirm that the scenes are in the proper order - just that they're close. Fixing it should consist mostly of shifting paragraphs around. Once we see how the season concludes, we should be able to whittle this section to a more compact, streamlined summary. There are probably editors who can do it now - but I didn't want to miss something important (while keeping as much of the original as possible). ZZ 15:10, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- You are completely right, and that's an issue for a vast amount of plot summaries over here. They often start out as "then he said and then she said and then he did and then she said", and it takes quite a bit of work and some amount of thought to make compact, succint and far more readable and informative versions (not to mention that I've seen at least one compact summary degenerated into a blow-by-blow retelling). The ones for the newest episodes haven't had time to mature. Anything you could do to help would be cool. --Kizor 13:38, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- is it just me, or should there be slightly more succint plot summaries? They seem to go on for ages, especially for the last few episodes. It might not actually be possible to trim them down though as a lot of the information is fairly important. Maybe have a plot overview above the bigger (almost) scene-by-scene breakbown? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chibimech 03:58, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Molly Walker
editWhen Bennett says that they need to destroy the tracking system, is he refering to molly walker? I think I heard him said the "walker" system—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 201.229.239.41 (talk • contribs).
- He hasn't shown that he knows that the "Walker" system is a little girl, just that it's a new system that seems to be able to find anyone, anywhere - certainly in line with what Molly can do. He might not even know, since he seems to be "Middle Management". He does appear to know where she/the system is, though, since he reunites with Claire outside the very building where Molly & Mohinder (and Micah & Candice) (!) are located. ZZ 12:34, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- well it seems that he knew it was a person, but didn´t know it was a little girl, either way, he won't kill her as Molly was alive in Five Years Gone 200.88.230.146 19:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
anyone know who or what"can see her" when shes using her power? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.108.116.163 (talk) 20:21, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- That was Matt's father. — Edokter • Talk • 20:46, 15 March 2008 (UTC)