Talk:The Harrowing (Inside No. 9)/GA1

Latest comment: 10 years ago by J Milburn in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 23W (talk · contribs) 21:35, 26 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

What a terrifying-sounding episode.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Duplication Detector spotchecks turned up nothin'.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Great article! Couldn't find much of anything wrong, which is no surprise, considering you've probably perfected the format with the other GANs for the series. Pass! 23W 20:58, 29 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review, thoroughly appreciated. Any comments, no matter how taxing, picky or small, are welcome. J Milburn (talk) 21:14, 29 July 2014 (UTC)Reply