Talk:The History of British Political Parties/GA1

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 00:43, 14 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I shall be reviewing this page against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

edit
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):  
    • The prose is good and thoroughly readable
    b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    • All sources appear to be WP:RS
    c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its scope.
    a (major aspects):  
    • It is a thorough description of the subject
    b (focused):  
    • The article remains focussed on its subject
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    • The article is neutral
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
    • Stable
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    • A suitable non-free use rationale has been provided
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    • The image is captioned
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: