Talk:The History of Love
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Skrolik in topic parts are interpretation, not summary
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
parts are interpretation, not summary
editSome parts of this article seem to be the author's ideas about the novel, including interpretations, rather than research and factual reporting. This is particularly the case toward the end of the summary. Shouldn't the interpretations (which read like part of an essay) be removed as overly subjective? Skrolik (talk) 03:00, 1 July 2024 (UTC)