Talk:The Hollywood Argyles

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

This article is in terrible shape. I hope some other editors can help bring it up to Wiki Standards. Junebug52 04:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

"Terrible"? The original article pre-dated WP's post-Nature/EB, suddenly-converted fetish for extensive citation. All info could have been cited at creation, and it's a shame that everyone has to pull their sources back together months or years after writing articles.

At the time it was written, the information was clearly reliable (to the extent that the people quoted are reliable at least) if you actually read the article and references. Furthermore, the amount of reliable information on the HA is limited; as founder Paxton said, there was no band. I'd be delighted to see more, and will keep adding what I can find ... as I just did today. As for the disparaging adjectives, stuff 'em; I don't like being denigrated after putting in hours just pulling together what I did have. In short, Junebug, get squashed. Twang 04:38, 20 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Hollywood Argyles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:33, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Reply