Talk:The Hurricane and Rosey

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleThe Hurricane and Rosey has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 20, 2009Good article nomineeListed
December 21, 2009Good topic candidatePromoted
April 2, 2024Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Good article

Discussion

edit

Re: The "Hurricane" superhero gimmick being dropped – was this in any way related to hurricanes Katrina and Rita and the destruction they caused? [[Briguy52748 19:47, 8 November 2005 (UTC)]]Reply

i think so because pepole complaned about his theme music stand back theres a hurricane comeing throgh Sailor cuteness 13:43, 2 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

No, that had nothing to do with it.

Name

edit

Should't this article be names "Rosey and The Hurricane"? That is how they were always referred to. TJ Spyke 02:56, 31 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Rosey and The Hurricane/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Giants27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 02:24, 19 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:  
Manual of Style compliance:  

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:  
Citations to reliable sources, where required:  
No original research:  

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:  
Focused:  

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:  

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):  

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  

Overall:

Pass or Fail:  
Very minor stuff, but I'd like if you could do quick source check to see if you can expand on some details of the duo.--Giants27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 02:24, 19 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
This is really all the info. available for the team. If there was more, believe me it would be included in the article. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:26, 19 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Yep, we really used all the avaliable info from the sources in the article. ♥NiciVampireHeart16:13, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'm now passing the article, nice work on this.--Giants27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 20:34, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Hurricane and Rosey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:02, 13 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on The Hurricane and Rosey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:11, 25 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Hurricane and Rosey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:19, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply