Talk:The IIconics

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Adumbrativus in topic Requested move November 6 2022

Orphaned references in Billie Kay and Peyton Royce

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Billie Kay and Peyton Royce's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "NXT23/11/16":

  • From Peyton Royce: Richard, Trionfo (November 23, 2016). "WWE NXT REPORT: MATCHES FROM TORONTO, COMMENTS FROM PARTICIPANTS AT TAKEOVER, AND THE REMATCH HAS BEEN ANNOUNCED". PWInsider. Retrieved November 25, 2016.
  • From Billie Kay: Richard, Trionfo (23 November 2016). "WWE NXT REPORT: MATCHES FROM TORONTO, COMMENTS FROM PARTICIPANTS AT TAKEOVER, AND THE REMATCH HAS BEEN ANNOUNCED". PWInsider. Retrieved 25 November 2016.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 10:04, 17 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Billie Kay and Peyton Royce

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Billie Kay and Peyton Royce's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "WWE NXT 12/9/15 results":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 19:47, 18 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in The IIconics

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of The IIconics's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "OWW":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 10:48, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 31 October 2021

edit

The IInspiration -> The IIconics. Don’t see why this was moved, as WP:COMMONNAME plays an impact in this, so it should still be the IIconics. PedigreeWWEFigz87V2 (talk) 14:43, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Requested move November 6 2022

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 04:12, 16 November 2022 (UTC)Reply


IInspirationThe IIconics – The team had more exposure as The IIconics in WWE, rather than their time with Impact. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 16:01, 6 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

In WWE, they had global exposure as The IIconics, including a title victory at WrestleMania. Their 4 years in the largest promotion in the world is more notable than her one year with Impact HHH Pedrigree (talk) 11:11, 7 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.