Talk:The Industrial Worker, 1840–1860

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	It is requested that a picture or pictures be included in this article to improve its quality.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses a sub-category of Category:Book stubs on the article page.

If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
If you disagree with this assessment, please:

Change the above "class=stub" to "class=start" or another applicable class per Wikipedia:WikiProject Books/Assessment#Quality scale;
Remove the stub template from the article.

Malformed sentence?

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

> The book suggests that the traditional historical underemphasis of class consciousness and radicalism was the natural reaction of workers to the perceived dehumanization of capitalist society, following the rise of industrialism in mid-19th century America.

The natural reaction of the workers [...] was underemphasis of class consciousness and radicalism? Surely this should read something like, "The book suggests that class consciousness and radicalism was the natural reaction of the workers [...]", and then in a separate clause say that this has been traditionally undermphasised. Fedjmike (talk) 20:17, 24 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic