Talk:The Italian Socialists

Move The Socialists (Italy) to The Socialists

edit
The following discussion is an archived move proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was NO CONSENSUS to move page, per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 16:50, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply


The Socialists (Italy)The SocialistsThe Socialists is a redirect to The Socialists (Italy), I would prefer the opposite, 'cos there's no other party called The Socialists in Wikipedia.. Checco 16:53, 25 February 2007 (UTC)copied from WP:RM Bobblehead 20:50, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Reply

Survey

edit
Add  # '''Support'''  or  # '''Oppose'''  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.

Survey - in support of the move

edit
  1. Support, as explained above --Checco 12:06, 26 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Survey - in opposition to the move

edit
  1. Weak Oppose: there seem to be limited sources that this obscure party ever existed, so its name in English is uncertain. But it is at least as likely that anyone searching for The Socialists is in fact looking for Socialism. Absent proof that The is invariably used for these people in English, Wikipedia convention would be to call this article Socialists (Italy); but it might be just as well to have that redirect to Italian Socialist Party. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 21:28, 26 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
    No, no: The Socialists (with article) is a tiny Italian party. See it:I Socialisti. --Checco 23:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
    No, it should be called "The Socialists" with the article, as it's a defining part of the name. (Compare the various green parties around, for instance, and many other party articles.) I would agree with your other point, though. —Nightstallion (?) 23:32, 26 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
  2. Weak Oppose. The party is new, small and obscure; "The" is a fairly weak disambiguator, and, as PMAnderson said, it might be even better off at "Socialists (Italy)" absent a firm English translation (which it may never get). Duja 14:33, 27 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
    The party is small but known, in Italy. Its official name is I Socialisti (English: The Socialists. I can't see what's the problem. --Checco 18:46, 27 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
  3. Oppose. I agree with PMAnderson that it's quite likely for someone looking for "the socialists" to be looking for socialism. The current title is fine. coelacan talk06:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
  4. opposeMost users would not regard the presence or absence of the word "the" as something that makes a name distinctive. DGG 07:27, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
    Ok, I notice that both Coelacan and DGG didn't mind to read what was the problem, so their comments have little meaning. Here we have a page named The Socialists (Italy), while The Socialists is a redirect to The Socialists (Italy). As it is a redirect to our page, why not changing the title of the page to The Socialists (this would be the correct title and now it is only a redirect, not to Socialism but to The Socialists (Italy)? Please, read before writing. --Checco 09:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
    Oh, I read your issue, all right. I just don't agree with you. Don't make snarky assumptions about what others have and haven't read. If you're going to use the argument that "The Socialists already redirects here", then I'll just go ahead and fix that. I've redirected The Socialists to socialism now, as that's the most sensible target for that redirect. coelacan talk16:08, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Discussion

edit
Add any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The party changed name into The Italian Socialists, thus the discussion above has no importance now. --Checco 16:48, 13 March 2007 (UTC)Reply