Talk:The Kirkby Project
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Infobox
editTenants Everton F.C. (after construction) - Are there tenants on the site at this point? Londo06 20:17, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
212.248.245.252 (Talk)
editI am following this page and I am concerned the above user is editing all things anti-Kirkby project, whether there is a KEIOC bias I do not know. However the page needs to be viewed balanced not every quotable anti-Kirkby under the sun. I have asked the editor to refrain from editing this page into something resembling 'keep Everton in our city' campaign. Dmcm2008 (talk) 15:28, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
It is clear to me this page is becoming an anti-Kirkby project them and one of the references citing negative comments after kings dock (6) is actually toffeeweb and not Daily Mirror. This cannot be used as it is a false reference. If these false references are throughout they will be removed.Dmcm2008 (talk) 14:45, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Reliable sources
editThis article is riddled with unreliable sources and false sources quoting reliable sources on a "Toffeeweb" website. There needs to be a clean up and some reliable sources added. Dmcm2008 (talk) 15:01, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
location
editI am querying why my edit was removed that the location of the ground is a stones throw away from Kirkby's main bus terminus and also that Kirkby station is a similar short distance away as Goodison is from Kirkdale. The article needs a balanced view as as it stands it looks as if everyone thinks the public transport is inadequate etc but the points i have made make it balanced. agreed, perhaps the current rail facility might not cope. an everton supporter —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.75.103.125 (talk) 14:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC)