Talk:The Legend of Korra season 4

Reliable sources for episode titles

I contend that these additions, re-added multiple times by A1natics (talk · contribs), are not reliably sources because tweets from a fan site don't meet WP:RS. Opinions?  Sandstein  17:27, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Agree entirely; while I appreciate A1natics help, this material shouldn't be included until verified by reliable sources per WP:RS. –Prototime (talk · contribs) 18:34, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Agree. Although there hasn't been lots of discussion on the matter Nickandmore.com isn't presently considered a reliable source. And, I think users often get really into "scooping" other users that they forget there is no deadline. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:22, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

I disagree completely. They seem more than reliable to me, and as it is only ging to be temporary I see no problem with keeping them for now. Keep at it A1natics (talk · contribs). Some fantastic edit! SizzlingHot (talk) 19:44, 3 December 2014 (UTC) — SizzlingHot (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Does this mean mu opinio is discounted? I don't think that's fair but as the majority think the site is wrong it seems only right that the section is remo Intel integrated graphicsed until a more reliable source if found.SizzlingHot (talk) 17:39, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

What exactly do you mean by your previous comment? What exactly do you mean by "section is remo Intel integrated graphicsed"? Since you seem to understand that consensus is against you, I don't understand what exactly you want done since in the meantime. By any chance could you explain? Luthien22 (talk) 22:52, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Reception

The reception for the season needs to be expanded beyond just the ending because there is much more to explore then a relationship between two main characters.--106.68.23.249 (talk) 10:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Studio mir

Why is Studio Mir listed for every episode if they are the animator for every episode? Perhaps they could be listed once. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.151.53.102 (talk) 23:53, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Courtesy message

Sandstein, since I ran out of space in the edit summary to politely invite you to discuss the disputed edit, I'll do so here. The main thrust of my editorial perspective can be found in said edit summary, but as the exact balance on detail in these sorts of articles is a meaningful topic of discussion, I'm by all means happy to have one--if I can convince you to be more specific about what details you think are unnecessary. Snow ^{let's rap} 09:01, 13 October 2018 (UTC)