Talk:The Legend of Spyro

WTF?

I have been the most active contributor the the Spyro (series) article, and I must say, I can't let this happen. All of them deserve their own, seperate article. They shouldn't be mashed up into one singular thing. The Spyro (series) page had a great basic coverage, but this is quite literally, just those three articles horribley mashed together. I am reverting it until a consensus is reached. Wise dude321 (talk) 17:03, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Listen to me, and listen well, Wise dude321. They should be mashed up together because they are direct continuations of each other and they have NOTHING to do with Spyro the Dragon or its sequels, got it? Enco1984 (talk) 01:59, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

But the Spyro series article isn't just for the original continuity, it's for every thing Spyro related. Cut and pasting it all is too excessive, and doesn't improve the encyclopedia. I suggest that we keep the coresponding articles, and change this into a general overview. Removing the other articles from existence is too much of a step though.Wise dude321 (talk) 22:50, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Combining the articles can work if it is more likely that they will have an encyclopedic treatment of the subject together than apart. Here is an example of a trilogy that works better with a single article than with three. Here, here, and here is an example of a trilogy that works better with three articles than with one. An important distinction is that in the first example, all the games are on the same platform, while the second example has them released on platforms of different generations.

This is not to say that we can't have an article on a trilogy and articles on the parts of the trilogy. The trilogy article would have very basic information on the games, describing the similarities and differences of the games, while the individual articles would go more in depth about the games themselves. Larrythefunkyferret (talk) 08:46, 4 March 2009 (UTC) The "Basic Info on this, extensive info on the other articles is a good idea that I could get behind. I have no problems with that, make it work.Wise dude321 (talk) 15:34, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

I've established a "template" of what the trilogy article should look like in my sandbox. Feel free to edit it to your hearts' content. Hopefully, we can get a decently developed article that we can just move into the space that this talk page belongs to. I've left some notes about what the sections should look like as comments, and all I ask is that you not delete the sections currently there, as they will be important in the future when we push for Good Article status. If you feel that it needs additional sections, though, feel free to add them. I will be working on it periodically as time and ability allow. If you have any questions, ask them either on my sandbox talk page or my personal talk page. Larrythefunkyferret (talk) 07:56, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Edit Protected

Resolved

{{editprotected}}

The redirect does not work because someone has placed "<s></s>" in front of the redirect, can someone please remove this? TARTARUS ^talk 01:19, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm going to request tommorrow that the full protects be removed because no progress has been made in the discussion. So yeah, you just have to wait until tomorrow.Wise dude321 (talk) 03:50, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

The requested edit has been made. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:01, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Additional Discussion

I thought it'd be a good idea to provide this link to additional discussion on this article. There's a grand total of five sections, from Legend of Spyro to Development links. Larrythefunkyferret (talk) 03:33, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Legend of Spyro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070517040318/http://www.gamespot.com:80/ps2/action/legendofspyro/review.html? to http://www.gamespot.com/ps2/action/legendofspyro/review.html
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100226012244/http://xbox360.gamezone.com:80/gzreviews/r35288.htm to http://xbox360.gamezone.com/gzreviews/r35288.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:56, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Spliting The Legend of Spyro 3D

The Legend of Spyro 3D needs some importing from Spyro Wiki.

• Does someone get the links from Spyro Wiki? Longplay Watcher (talk) 12:59, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

There is currently insufficient content/references to justify a split, per WP:SPLIT. It also seems like the cancelled film is not notable enough for its own article, so I removed the request. It is definitely worth a mention in this article, of course. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 09:33, 6 December 2021 (UTC)