Talk:The Magic Pudding

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Acwilson9 in topic Puppet show

Lindsay's nativism

edit

"In its original form the book also reflects Lindsay's rather right-wing and racist leanings; modern editions, for example, usually omit the line "you unmitigated Jew", which is used by one character as an insult."

This is clearly in breach of the WP:NPOV policy, but the sentence appears to contain some useful information and the potential for more so I don't want to delete it. Grumpyyoungman01 13:12, 20 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

So I've removed the NPOV header and taken out the note about Lindsay being a racist. I've also chopped the note about the line removal. Lindsay does in fact seem to have been a nationalist and a racist (see Norman Lindsay, and a right-winger even by the standards of the day. And the line is changed in some contemporary editions , (it's gone in the Phillip Pullman edited edition I have, fro example). But given the length of the article as it stands, it seems insane to devote that much space to this one tiny issue. In other words, this is information that seems like it should be in the article, but only if the thing is ever significantly expanded. That's my take, anyway. NoahB 01:02, 23 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Much more than a children's book

edit

Although it is perhaps at its best when read to a child, this is much more than a book for children. It is both a wonderful parody of a whole genre of Australian children's literature, and a biting satire of Australian society (the judge's politically incorrect epithet is part of that satire). Not only that, but it is a hilarious read for all ages. Does anyone know of any citable critical work that deals with these aspects of the book? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.77.137.57 (talk) 19:24, 11 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Work needed

edit

What we need to see on this page is information about the Magic Puddin's print history. How many editions are known? How many are "authorized," how many "bowdlerized"? What is the story on the recent reissue? Xaosdog 02:39, 23 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

You know, there is some misinformation here -- in some places the article indicates a first publication date of 1917, elsewhere of 1918. Also, the article misstates that there is only one female in the book, Sam Sawnoff's supposed bride; but the rooster's wife is also both mentioned and illustrated, for all that she isn't given a voice. (Neither, for that matter, is the supposed bride, other than through hearsay.) Xaosdog 20:28, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
Does the "Plot Summary" section contain original reasearch? If not, it should have citations. If so, what should be done about it? Also, the summary might better refer to "Puddin' thieves" instead of "Pudding thieves".) Acwilson9 (talk) 01:47, 13 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Puppet show

edit

Could someone who actually knows anything about it add something about the puppet show? All I know is that it existed and was performed in theatres in the early '70s. My Grade 2 class went to see it, and I was thoroughly confused, couldn't make head or tail of it, especially since I hadn't read the book. -- Zsero(talk) 04:57, 28 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Found and added. (I wonder if it ever toured outside of Australia, to which this Anglo-American has never been.) Acwilson9 (talk) 00:51, 14 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Magic Pudding. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:16, 7 January 2018 (UTC)Reply