This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Synopsis
editHow about a synopsis in the leading paragraph? What is this play even about? It's all well and good that it was met with mixed reviews... but why??? ;) --31.150.198.168 (talk) 21:35, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
I'd like to know more of these 'mixed reviews'. Which reviews? When? The play remained highly popular in the Restoration period and has since been considered by many critics as one of Beaumont and Fletcher's core works along with Philaster and A King And No King. This is a poor article. Aldiboront (talk) 19:52, 1 August 2019 (UTC)