Talk:The Mind of God

This page was proposed for deletion by Moriwen (talk · contribs) on 7 February 2024.

Philosophy: Literature / Science / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Philosophy of science
	Contemporary philosophy

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

God returns favour

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have heard through the grapevine that a companion volume to Davies’ “The Mind of God” is being published, and the two volumes taken together will answer everything. The second is called “The Mind of Paul Davies”, and is rather longer and more complicated than the first, and is written, interestingly enough, by the author of the earlier work. Myles325a (talk) 06:54, 29 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hawking Misquote

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hawking's A Brief History of Time seems to be misleadingly misquoted in the first paragraph of the article.

The quote should be "However, if we do discover a complete theory, it should in time be understandable in broad principle by everyone, not just by a few scientists. Then we shall all, philosophers, scientists and just ordinary people, be able to take part in the discussion of the question of why it is that we and the universe exist. If we find the answer to that, it would be the ultimate triumph of human reason -- for then we would know the mind of God."

(Notice that it is the answer to the "why" question, not the theory of everything, which Hawking is saying would be the ultimate triumph of human reason.)

Never having seen the Davies book, I don't know whether the misquote / misinterpretation comes from Davies or from the authors of the article. For that reason, I will hold off on editing the article for now.University of Saturn (talk) 16:31, 9 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic