Talk:The Moons

File:Picture 58.png Nominated for Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Picture 58.png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:52, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

File:UK Tour.png Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:UK Tour.png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:UK Tour.png) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:35, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Revert edits

Mrrooftop, as WP:SPA has made a large revision to the article which includes copyright images, advertorial prose such as, "2012 started as a quite year for Crofts" and unverifiable claims such as, "Insisting that the deal had to be done correctly, Crofts refused to sign the deal unless it was signed on a full moon 21st February.". As this article has been the subject of COI promotion in the past, I have asked Mrrooftop to come here and explain his edits before I take this issue to WP:COIN. I'm basing my feeling that this is a COI case on the fact that many of the files uploaded by the user are copyrighted on the band's various websites and the user claims to have created those works. OlYeller21^Talktome 18:28, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Additional info

Additional information for the article can be found at [1], [2], [3], [4] and at [5], [6], [7]. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 10:44, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to disclose

The conflict of interest guideline strongly encourages editors in your position to disclose their affiliation with the topic. When an editor engages in editing behavior that suggests they have an affiliation with the company, but they do not disclose, this raises suspicions that you are editing "on the sly" or are trying to game the system, in particular when multiple accounts are involved and the subject participates in their own AfD discussion.

If you were to consolidate on one account and disclose your conflict of interest, that would be the start for a more productive resolution for everyone and possibly a pathway for future contributions from your organization that are within Wikipedia's guidelines.

I hope you will read my advice and strongly consider disclosing your conflict of interest here. User:King4057 (EthicalWiki) 15:20, 3 August 2012 (UTC)