Talk:The Most Deadly Game

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	A production section needs to be added to this article, or the current one needs to be expanded. This section discusses the "behind the scenes" aspects of the production process, award nominations, and insights into the casting and staffing where possible.
	A response section needs to be added to this article, or the current one needs to be expanded. This section should be well cited using neutral and reliable sources that discuss the reaction of both critics and the viewing audience to the show. Additionally, document any impact the show has had on society, and merchandise that may have resulted from the show, such as toys, games, etc.

Untitled

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Agree to adding disambiguation page. Boredofitall (talk) 17:40, 22 June 2008 (UTC)boredofitallReply

I think somebody needs to explain why it would even be necessary. The article describes only one thing: an early 1970s TV series. It does not describe multiple things called "The Most Deadly Game". Is there even anything else that uses this title? If there is, it's pretty darn obscure, and at any rate it isn't mentioned in this article. Are you perhaps thinking of the short story, "The Most Dangerous Game" or one of its adaptations? That's a completely different title, and it has its own article(s). So, why? Why would you need to split this or turn it into a disambiguation page? Very Strongly Disagree 71.200.138.188 (talk) 02:53, 27 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

The article used to mention an organization with the same name. I removed it last year (notability issues) but neglected to remove the "split" template. I don't know of anything else of note that uses this title. Marasmusine (talk) 08:47, 27 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wrong iwikis

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Sorry for my English. Does each iwiki in this article wrong? It leads to Role playing games, not to the film. My page in ru-wiki 95.24.246.155 (talk) 14:52, 17 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic