Talk:The Music of Grand Theft Auto V/GA1
Latest comment: 10 years ago by XXSNUGGUMSXX in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 19:18, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Prose
-
- Lead
-
- The "producers who collaborated with each-other during Grand Theft Auto V's development" bit would read better as simply "producers who collaborated with each-other during the game's development"
- The "music had been appropriated effectively for Grand Theft Auto V's gameplay" bit would ready better as something like "music had been appropriated effectively for gameplay".
- Background and recording
-
- "Early in Grand Theft Auto V's development" → "Early in the game's development"
- "'Welcome to Los Santos', Grand Theft Auto V's main theme" → "'Welcome to Los Santos', the game's main theme"
- Sourcing
-
- Background and recording
-
- In the third paragraph, ref#3 (Polygon) doesn't need to be used more than once in a row per WP:OVERCITE- it's currently being used twice in a row after ref#5 (Clash)
- More WP:OVERCITE in fourth paragraph- just use ref#5 (Clash) at the end of the paragraph
- Coverage
-
- Could you perhaps find another paragraph's worth or two of reviews from critics?
- Is any information available on commercial performance?
- Neutrality
-
- No problems here
- Stability
-
- No problems here
- GA Result
-
- If these are all addressed within the next seven days, I will pass the GAN.
I've gone through and addressed most of these problems; the two comments you made for "Coverage" will be looked into. I'm sure we can find some more information to add. -- Rhain1999 (talk to me) 22:37, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Sounds good, just let me know within the next day or two what you find. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 00:45, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
- @XXSNUGGUMSXX: In regards to your comments about coverage, I'm afraid the answer is no to both questions. I have tried to locate more reviews to add to the critical reception section, but all of the sites covered by WP:VG/RS and WP:ALBUM/SOURCE have already been used. In terms of commercial performance, nope, there's nothing. No chart history or sales reports. CR4ZE (t • c) 07:23, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the effort, though. Passing. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 15:04, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
- @XXSNUGGUMSXX: In regards to your comments about coverage, I'm afraid the answer is no to both questions. I have tried to locate more reviews to add to the critical reception section, but all of the sites covered by WP:VG/RS and WP:ALBUM/SOURCE have already been used. In terms of commercial performance, nope, there's nothing. No chart history or sales reports. CR4ZE (t • c) 07:23, 15 April 2014 (UTC)