Talk:The Next Day/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Speatle (talk · contribs) 12:31, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

I’ll review this soon, probably within the next week or so. I’ve started reviewing the article, and hope to finish tomorrow.

Speatle Done – zmbro _{(talk) (cont)} 17:58, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Looks mostly good. I did a bit more ce for things I forgot to mention. One more thing before I can pass the article. " "(You Will) Set the World on Fire" is a pompous mid-1980s rocker, echoing Bowie's cover of Pop's "Bang Bang" on Never Let Me Down. It takes place in 1960s Greenwich Village amid protests occurring during that time." Is there a source for this, or is it another one that has a cite one or two sentences later? Speatle (talk to me) please ping me when replying to something I said. 18:55, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Speatle Another. Like I said, everything is properly cited. – zmbro _{(talk) (cont)} 21:37, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Mostly looking good here, although I’m a bit worried about MOS:SAID (explain and confess are used a few times in the article)

   Not all instances I find violates that but I changed instances where I agree. – zmbro _{(talk) (cont)} 17:57, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   Once again, mostly good, although there are some sentences that might need a citation moved over (ex. “Where Are We Now?" is about Bowie's time living in Berlin in the late 1970s). Earwig shows a copyvio percentage of 43.8, but it’s all quotes and song names.

   That's cited by Pegg in the second sentence. Citing every sentence is overkill but I ensure everything is properly cited. – zmbro _{(talk) (cont)} 17:57, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Despite being over 100,000 bytes, the article is a quick read while still being relatively focused and covering major aspects.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   All looking good here!

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   I’m not very experienced with image copyright, but to my unexperienced eye, it looks good to me.

   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Is the Gerry Leonard picture really necessary for the article?

   I mean he co-wrote two tracks while Bowie wrote everything else so I'd say it's relevant. – zmbro _{(talk) (cont)} 17:57, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

1. Overall: This is a nice article, but it still needs a bit of minor work before I can wholeheartedly pass it. I’m putting it on hold for a week so minor issues noted in the review can be fixed.All issues have been fixed and concerns assuaged. This article passes.

   Pass/Fail: