Talk:The Night God Slept

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedy deleted as being about a musical recording that does not indicate its own importance and where the artist's article does not exist, because when this name is google'd, it results in over 70,000 references. It has to be of at least mild importance to reach this level.

https://www.google.com/search?q=the+night+god+slept&oq=the+night+god+slept&aqs=chrome..69i57j0j69i60j69i61.3631j0j7&client=ubuntu-browser&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8#q=%22the+night+god+slept%22&start=10

--Cusku'i (talk) 01:50, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedy deleted as being about a musical recording that does not indicate its own importance and where the artist's article does not exist, because the article about the band has yet to be written. (We're not talking about a small garage band, but about a band which has almost 20k fans on Facebook, so I think they should be encyclopedically relevant.) I see that it definitely wasn't the best idea to first compose an article about the debut album before composing an article about the band themselves (which I will do - tomorrow. It's 2:51AM and I need some sleep.), but I do believe the article complies with Wikipedia's standards about encyclopedic relevance and citations.

EDIT (4:20 AM) Now the band has an article, too. Hope someone will remove the deletion request now. --Steenvoortl (talk) 01:53, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

An article which is up for speedy deletion as well. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 03:25, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Reception

Someone please merge the sections "Critical reception" and "Reception". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.1.8.194 (talk) 22:09, 16 April 2016 (UTC)