Talk:The One with the Prom Video
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The One with the Prom Video article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | The One with the Prom Video has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Successful good article nomination
editI am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of October 21, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Aside from a few (very minor) syntax and typos that I corrected myself, the article was well written and an easy read. If you do any more expansion (and you should before WP:FAC, I would suggest getting an experienced copyeditor over here, first.
- 2. Factually accurate?: Cited to (13) good WP:RS sources, with proper WP:CIT formatting, nice job.
- 3. Broad in coverage?: As the contents show, major subsections include Plot, Production, Reception, Legacy. I would expand the plot a teensy bit before trying for FA, and if you can find any more sources for tidbits in Reception and Legacy, all the better too. But as is it looks good.
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Phrased in a neutrally worded manner.
- 5. Article stability? Article appears stable going back several months.
- 6. Images?: One image, with a good detailed fair use rationale given on the image page. If you could find a promotional poster specifically for this episode or something like that, that would be nice in the infobox.
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. — Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 21:34, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- Overall, a good article, and a pleasant read, thank you. As you go forward, make sure to submit for a Peer Review, as your article may expand and change, and as it does, get a copyeditors. Cheers. Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 21:34, 24 October 2007 (UTC).
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The One with the Prom Video. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140903202143/http://rankings.gawker.com/every-episode-of-friends-ranked-1629809447 to http://rankings.gawker.com/every-episode-of-friends-ranked-1629809447
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:40, 18 June 2017 (UTC)