Talk:The Phoenix Requiem
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 15 August 2008. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Update Schedule
editWhat day does this comic update? --DarshaAssant (talk) 00:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- It updates Mondays and Thursdays. I have added the schedule to the summary and included an infobox... Isron (talk) 23:12, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Jonas' wife
editSarah Ellerton stated in the forums of the Phoenix Requiem's website, that the woman in the dream in fact was Jonas' wife. I added a link to her post as a reference.Isron (talk) 20:30, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Shorten?
editI plan on substantially shortening the Plot and Character sections in the near future, any objections ahead of time? Kuro ♪ 05:37, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
- Good idea, they could use it. I think Tobias, Moretty, the kids, the McArthurs, Davith, and all the creatures could be dropped entirely. Anyone disagree? Tualha (Talk) 23:46, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- I am totally in favor of that, I plan on doing some major editing as well once I finish reading through the archives. The Creatures section totally needs to go, there is nothing notable in there; and the Minor Characters section should go (or, at the very least, be trimmed down to little more than a list). Reception can be fleshed out a lot more, both by adding more sources and just by improving the quality of writing in that section in general. Anyway, that's just the stuff I noticed at first glance, and I'll probably start working on that within the next couple days, but if you want to edit any of those sections feel free to jump in as well! —Politizer( talk • contribs ) 04:57, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
I just removed the ridiculously long and detailed plot section. I'm not even going to bother pasting it into here to save it, because it's so long; it can be accessed through the history if anyone needs to recover anything from it.
The version I quickly threw together now is still quite a bit too long for how long the comic currently is. If I remember to work on this later, I'll try to whittle it down some. —Politizer talk/contribs 01:44, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Just going to pipe up here and say that I don't think ANY webcomic is remotely relevant or significant in the overall realms of human knowledge and creativity. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.161.54.12 (talk) 15:36, 28 September 2010 (UTC)