Talk:The Pioneer Mother Memorial/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Eteethan (talk · contribs) 13:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Plenty of refs.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	All sources are reliable.
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Checked using CopyVio detector.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Has all the history and important information.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Stays focused on topic.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Checked and passed.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	No recent edits by other users.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Fixed.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	All images are of good quality and have captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	The image problem is fixed, so we're good to go.

This is a very nice article. It is just the right length for this subject.

Thank you! Happy to address any questions or concerns you may have. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:11, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

@Another Believer: Take a look here. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think your photos are copyrighted. However, this article passes all other criteria. Eteethan(talk) 20:20, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Do you mean to say that the photos are of a copyrighted work? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:28, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

I have nominated all four images in the Commons Category for deletion. I will re-upload two of them here at English Wikipedia under fair use.  Done ---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:33, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Update: I have nominated all four images at Commons for deletion. I re-uploaded two here at English Wikipedia, which are now displayed in the article. I think this should take care of all concerns. Assuming the Commons images are deleted, and therefore the Commons category as well, I will update this article accordingly to not display the Commons box at the bottom. Thank you for taking time to review this article. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:44, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.