Talk:The Plain Dealer/GA1
Latest comment: 10 years ago by TonyTheTiger in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) 08:13, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- I will review this.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 08:13, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- The tool box shows 3 deadlinks and a circular links problem with a redirect.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 22:04, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- The WP:LEAD does not summarize the article. It fails WP:WIAGA 1B.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 22:11, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- The article has several paragraphs and subsections that are entirely uncited. We need WP:ICs as WP:RSs. It fails WP:WIAGA 2B/2C.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 22:11, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- Fix the bare URLs.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 22:23, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- I don't consider it very likely that the history section is very comprehensive. I feel that this article probably fails WP:WIAGA 3A.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 22:18, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- This does not seem to tell us about the history of the headquarters and main printing locations.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 22:22, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- I am FAILing this article.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 22:22, 24 April 2014 (UTC)