Talk:The Princeton Tory

Latest comment: 19 hours ago by Melchior2006 in topic Vote for removing the tag about lacking notability

Untitled

edit

The Malkiel Incident was a one time event posted on the Magazine's website without authorization by the editors or publisher. It should not be the highlight of a three sentence article.

Items should not be censored from Wikipedia on account of their being "one time" events. It was written about in the campus newspaper, so it was obviously newsworthy. Joamiq (talk) 18:33, 23 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Why I reverted article to a previous version

edit

Previously, the article read as follows:

The Princeton Tory is a student-run conservative publication at Princeton University. The Tory was founded in 1984.[1] While the Tory is Princeton's primary source of conservative intellectual discourse, it is known to create campus controversy[2] and its writers have come under fire for reporting inaccuracies[3].

References

edit

This article is a stub. It barely touches upon the purpose of the magazine, its history, its successes, or its mistakes. By adding a reference to a singular incident that could potentially defame the publication's reputation without adding any other information about the magazine, we are not being true to Wikipedia's goal of objectivity. When this article is longer and more complete, the reference to the Malkiel blunder should be mentioned. Writing about it now is irresponsible.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:52, 17 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:23, 17 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Vote for removing the tag about lacking notability

edit

This student newspaper is/was a controversial medium at Princeton. Its contrary position to campus culture makes it notable, as do the people associated with it. It clearly attracted students of a certain stripe and had an influence on their development. I say remove the tag. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 17:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

OK. I'll take that as a vote of agreement. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 19:49, 22 November 2024 (UTC)Reply