| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The Weekend at Bernie's (album) article was blanked on 2024-01-04 and that title now redirects to The Queers. The contents of the former article are available in the redirect's history; for the discussion at that location, see the redirect's talk page. |
Zach from Rivethead
editI heard that Zach from the minneapolis pop punk (now-defunct) band Rivethead is now playing with The Queers. Can anyone else substantiate that? Xsxex 14:17, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Not homophobic
editI took out the reference to The Queers being homophobic. The last paragraph of the liner notes for the album "A Day Late and A Dollar Short" say "Having a song called "I want cunt" doesn't mean we're sexist, homophobic, racist assholes.". Unless someone can show otherwise they shouldn't be labeled homophobic. Eod punk 22:58, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- http://www.songmeanings.net/lyric.php?lid=88165
- http://www.songmeanings.net/lyric.php?lid=3530822107858654405
- http://www.songmeanings.net/lyric.php?lid=118062 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chinablasts (talk • contribs) 08:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- The song "Homo" is actually gay-positive. Plus, they're on Asian Man Records, who only sign bands who are anti-racist, anti-sexist and anti-prejudice. Don't take any song the Queers write too seriously. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.190.209.142 (talk) 10:55, August 25, 2007 (UTC)
External link suggestion: New interview with Joe Queer
editAs an editor at Crawdaddy!, and to comply with COI guidelines, I am not posting the link to this new interview with Joe King (aka Joe Queer) of the Queers. However, I would like to recommend it on its merits, and hope that an editor will find the time to examine the interview and—if he or she sees fit—post it to the external links section. In the interview, Joe discusses the band's history as well as his more recent activities as a producer. I appreciate your time. Crawdaddy! [1]
Mike harkin (talk) 16:33, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on The Queers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100824182707/http://mog.com:80/theblue60/blog/1307968 to http://mog.com/theblue60/blog/1307968
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:19, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Controversy
editIs it really relevant to have the entire controversy section devoted to one specific band member, rather than the band as a whole? It seems like it would be more appropriate on a page about Joe Queer rather than the entire band. Or maybe more condensed? The entire Controversy section is literally larger than the rest of the article, excluding lists of former band members and discography. As a snide side note, I do think it's funny that articles like this have such a robust Controversy section (especially comparatively to the article as a whole) whereas notable and popular controversial anti-Semitic figures, like Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib, do not. Subpar and loose standards like this are why I do not financially support wikipedia. 98.117.86.164 (talk) 13:20, 13 November 2019 (UTC)