Talk:The Raising of Lazarus (Sebastiano del Piombo)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

"The Raising of Lazarus" was only inventoried as NG1 in or around 1838 when the NG's pictures moved to the new purpose-built gallery in Trafalgar Square. Before that it had a different number, or several different numbers - the numbers in the published catalogues changed as the collection grew. It's not unlikely that it was given the number 1 in 1838 because it was considered the most important picture in the collection, though. Either that or just about the biggest and most troublesome.

Well, Cecil Gould's catalogue for The Sixteenth-Century Italian Schools at the National Gallery (1975) tells me that it was "No. 1 in the Angerstein catalogue of 1823" (p. 245). This was, of course, to become the Gallery's founding collection a year later; do we have evidence of its number having changed any time after that? [talk to the] HAM 22:56, 4 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Raising of Lazarus (Sebastiano del Piombo). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:54, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply