Talk:The Red Bulletin

Removed comment about 'distinguishing between fact and fiction'. The Red Bulletin is fact, so I have no idea what the problem is.

Please explain here how the entry needs to be improved and I'll do it. (Damian Corrigan)

It's taken verbatim from their own web site. I don't know what Wikipedia's policy is on descriptions like that. Personally I don't think there's anything wrong with doing that. The problem with this article though is that it sounds too cheeky. "State of the art" and "hard working" don't belong in there either. (Ryan)

Does anyone know how to get a copy of this? If so, this should be added to the article The Dunnie 17:12, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Go to their website, fly to an F1 race, or buy one secondhand-that's it, for now. 76.14.29.169 (talk) 21:55, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

File:The Red Bulletin.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:The Red Bulletin.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 20 June 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:The Red Bulletin.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:46, 20 June 2012 (UTC)