Wikipedia

Talk:The Red Tent (Diamant novel)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Since I cut out such a large part of the article, I wanted to go further into my reasoning than there was room for on the edit summary. I felt that there were two large issues with that section. The first was that only a small part of it seemed to address inaccuracies in the book and most of the rest of it consisted of a discussion of the benefits of not menstruating. While I haven't read The Red Tent in a while, I don't remember anything about why having your period was good. I left in the parts about women in prehistoric times not menstruating every month as opposed to women of modern times as well as the menstrual synchronicity parts, since they both actually address things that happened in the book. I did, however, add [citation needed] to everything I left there (even though I suspect both those criticisms are correct), which brings me to my next issue.

Nothing in that section was cited (nor was there anything in the reference list that looked like it pertained to menstruation in previous times or potential benefits and risks of amenorrhoea). This was particularly an issue in the parts that I removed, since the idea that amenorrhoea is more healthful than regular menstrual periods is not a common one, so (disregarding the question of whether it's a sufficiently widespread view to even be mentioned) it really needs to have supporting citations, especially since amenorrhoea is generally unusual and caused by either other health problems, pregnancy (and being constantly pregnant isn't easy on the body either), or menopause (which increases one's susceptibility to certain disorders including heart disease and osteoporosis). I also have questions about applying findings about hunter-gathers to all pre-historic groups in general, including people who practiced agriculture and/or herding, since lactation as birth control works for a shorter time in agricultural societies than hunter-gather ones. Further, the fact that suppressing the menstrual cycle helps with certain disorders doesn't mean it's necessarily better for the general female population. (Also, going by the wikipedia page on PMS, very few of the treatments for it involve any sort of manipulation of the menstrual cycle, and of the ones that do, I know that in at least some cases the patient takes birth control the standard way, i. e., she menstruates every month but doesn't ovulate.

TL;DR summary: I don't think the stuff that I removed was accurate, but I think the original author should get citations for it and try adding it to the actual amenorrhoea article because if you have evidence to support it, it's both interesting and pertinent to that article. 69.251.214.2 (talk) 03:05, 22 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

The publication date in the article is wrong-this is manifest from the book itself. The copyright date is 1997. jcb336. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcb336 (talk • contribs) 06:28, 22 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on The Red Tent. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:24, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Red Tent (Anita Diamant novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:05, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Red_Tent_(Diamant_novel)&oldid=1202725316"