Talk:The Reign of Terror (Doctor Who)
 | The Reign of Terror (Doctor Who) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
 | The Reign of Terror (Doctor Who) is part of the Doctor Who (season 1) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 14, 2018. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that John Gorrie has no memory of directing the third episode of the Doctor Who serial The Reign of Terror, despite official documentation stating he did? | ||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editThe executions of Robespierre are a subset of the entire historical period called the French Revolution. If words like "bloody days" are less than Wiki-like, that's OK. But we need to have something more accurate than just that the story is set in the French Revolution. (Granted, the serial compresses history about as much as a Shakespearian history play, but there is some need for accuracy here). So, I'm going to put something along those lines back in. Feel free to tweak, but please don't delete altogether without considering this point. --Proteus71 28 Apr 2005
Twitter as a source
editThere is no reason Twitter can't be a reliable source. Even though it's full of nonsense, impostors, satirists pretending to be impostors and impostors pretending to be satirists, it could, rarely, be good. This particular feed, while unverified by Twitter (the tick of approval) does appear to be 2|enteratin's feed. Having said all that, my natural inclination when seeing such an unlikely claim backed by such an unverified source, is to give a great big delete. Which I suspect is what most people would feel. So I suggest that while you could use it, subjects as trivial as upcoming releases DON'T have to be updated continually. We can wait until something's released before considering it notable. MartinSFSA (talk) 04:18, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on The Reign of Terror (Doctor Who). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121228210500/http://www.purpleville.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/rtwebsite/archive.htm to http://www.purpleville.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/rtwebsite/archive.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gallifreyone.com/review.php?id=h
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:59, 31 December 2017 (UTC)