Talk:The Resident (TV series)/GA1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2601:40F:4000:3D0:5574:BEAD:B7FF:3C01 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AmericanAir88 (talk · contribs) 00:00, 18 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Copyvio

edit
  • The beginning of the "Production Development" section is completely copied.

Issues

edit

@TheDoctorWho: Starting. AmericanAir88 (talk) 17:20, 24 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • Ref 31 is broken.
  • "Formerly called The City" should be at the beginning of the lead, not the middle.
  • The lead should talk a bit more about the show itself and its premise.
  • The lead should include reception and the most notable awards.
  • Any more info on Filming? Seems short
  • Picture of the cast or any notable actor in the cast?
  • Premise needs some citations.
  • Critical Response could be bigger.

Honestly, not much to critique about. I would like to see this a bit longer in some sections (critical response, lead, filming).

@AmericanAir88:
  • Tagged ref 31 with {{Dead link}} for now and plan to see if i can find an archived version or alternative source
  • Moved "Formally called The City" to be right after the show title in the lead.
  • The lead was expanded more about the show itself when info on the critical response and reception was added.
  • Added sentence and ref for rank and average viewers for reception in lead. Also added mention of Teen Choice Award nomination.
  • Not much else I could find on filming but did add a statement mentioning second season filming.
  • Picture of two notable cast members are in the casting section of production
  • Per MOS:TVPLOT: Plot summaries may be sourced from the works themselves, as long as only basic descriptions are given. The premise section is an overall view of the plot for the series and shouldn't need sourced if I am correct.
  • Extended critical response section.
As for the copyvio I believe the only problem is the quote box at the top of the production section. Will that be an issue? Other than ref 31 which I still intend to look at that should take care of the above issues. TheDoctorWho (talk) 20:34, 24 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

@TheDoctorWho: The copyvio is fine. Nice job. Finish up the dead link and I will do a second sweep. AmericanAir88 (talk) 02:07, 25 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

@AmericanAir88:   Done I found a source that quoted the previous tweet. TheDoctorWho (talk) 02:15, 25 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

@TheDoctorWho: Pass. AmericanAir88 (talk) 14:28, 26 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

The characters section contains major spoilers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:40F:4000:3D0:5574:BEAD:B7FF:3C01 (talk) 23:04, 5 June 2022 (UTC)Reply